Treatment patterns with etanercept and adalimumab for psoriatic diseases in a real-world setting
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND This study examined real-world etanercept and adalimumab treatment patterns in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or both. METHODS This retrospective analysis utilized data from patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or both from a large, US claims database. Outcome measures included persistence on index therapy; pauses (7-59 days) and gaps (≥60 days) in therapy; and rates of discontinuing, switching and restarting index therapy in nonpersistent patients. RESULTS Of 4,453 patients, 2,534 initiated etanercept and 1,919 initiated adalimumab. In psoriasis patients (n = 2,775), 46.4% and 56.8% on etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, were persistent for ≥12 months, 49.0% and 56.3% discontinued, 23.8% and 22.4% restarted and 14.9% and 11.3% switched index therapy within 12 months. In psoriatic arthritis patients (n = 1,197), 60.7% and 63.3% on etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, were persistent for ≥12 months, 48.3% and 51.6% discontinued, 25.8% and 20.0% restarted and 16.5% and 17.9% switched index therapy. In patients with both (n = 481), 58.1% and 59.6% on etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, were persistent for ≥12 months, 42.7% and 63.2% discontinued, 24.3% and 12.6% restarted and 21.4% and 15.8% switched index therapy. CONCLUSIONS Treatment modifications were common in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or both within 12 months of initiating etanercept or adalimumab.
منابع مشابه
Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND The relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patterns in US managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/o...
متن کاملCosts of tumor necrosis factor blockers per treated patient using real-world drug data in a managed care population.
BACKGROUND Several anti-inflammatory biologic medications are available in the United States for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis, moderate-to-severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab are approved for use in adults with any of these conditions, but predicting the annu...
متن کاملDrug survival of biologic therapy in a large, disease‐based registry of patients with psoriasis: results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)
BACKGROUND Drug survival is a marker for treatment sustainability in chronic diseases such as psoriasis. OBJECTIVE The aim of these analyses was to assess survival of biologic treatments in the PSOriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). METHODS PSOLAR is a large, prospective, international, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis receiving (or eligible for) systemic ...
متن کاملPsoriasiform Eruption and Worsening of Pustulosis Palmoplantaris After Treatment with Two Anti-TNF-α Inhibitors, Followed by Successful Treatment with Ustekinumab
INTRODUCTION Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. One of the side effects of TNF-inhibitors is the development of a psoriatiform eruption, also known as paradoxical psoriasis. In this case report, we describe a patient with this side effect after treatment with adalimumab and etanercept. CASE REPORT A 45-year-old female was treat...
متن کاملComparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept.
The absence of head-to-head trials is a common challenge in comparative effectiveness research and health technology assessment. Indirect cross-trial treatment comparisons are possible, but can be biased by cross-trial differences in patient characteristics. Using only published aggregate data, adjustment for such biases may be impossible. Although individual patient data (IPD) would permit adj...
متن کامل